VS We compared two 8-core processors Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 with Adreno 630 graphics and HiSilicon Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows significantly better up to AnTuTu 9 score β 405K vs 195KHas 1 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 71027% higher CPU clock speed 2800 vs 2200 MHzHas a smaller size transistor 10 versus 12 nmBetter instruction set architecture Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Higher GPU frequency ~41%Announced 8-months later Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 102331 70901 GPU 154456 33222 Memory 57724 33714 UX 87647 57642 Total score 405551 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 81% 84% Graphics test 8 FPS 3 FPS Score 1438 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 53 FPS [Ultra] 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile 55 FPS [High] 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends 48 FPS [High] 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] 52 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang 56 FPS [Ultra] 60 FPS [Ultra] Device Xiaomi Pocophone F1 1080 x 2246 Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 4x GHz β Kryo 385 Gold Cortex-A754x GHz β Kryo 385 Silver Cortex-A55 4x GHz β Cortex-A734x GHz β Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2800 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB L2 cache 256 KB 512 KB L3 cache 2 MB 1 MB Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count 3 billion billion TDP 9 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 630 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost GPU frequency 710 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 256 64 FLOPS 727 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 685 No Storage type UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X20 - 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 845 84 Total votes 111 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Snapdragon 845, or ask any questions
28999 USD (Amazon) The HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2018 and contains 8 processor cores (4x CortexHiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712HiSilicon Kirin 810 βΊ remove from comparisonThe HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to GHz bigLITTLE. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU Da Vinci architecture. The integrates LTE modem supports with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi and Bluetooth are integrated in the chip. The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy Snapdragon 710 βΊ remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SD710 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in early 2018, the SD710 is the first of the 700 series and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. Compared to the older Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm advertises the CPU clusters to be up to 20% faster and the GPU up to 35 %. The Snapdragon 710 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 βΊ remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SD712 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Compared to the Snapdragon 710 predecessor, the 712 offers a 10% faster CPU and GPU due to clock rate increases 100 MHz for the CPU It was announced early 2019 and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to or GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. The Snapdragon 712 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.ModelHiSilicon Kirin 810Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 712SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm SnapdragonCodenameCortex-A76/-A55Kryo 360Kryo 360Series Snapdragon Kryo 360HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 990 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 810 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 980 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55Clock1880 - 2270 MHz2200 MHz2300 MHzCores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8Technology7 nm10 nm10 nmFeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 GHz, LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouAdreno 612 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra 250 ISP, GPS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou, GalileoAdreno 616 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra ISPiGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 616Qualcomm Adreno 616ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 710Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 712BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810 Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 710 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 18123 avg 23401 median 24426 21% max 27654 Points min 13595 avg 14925 median 12% max 18181 Points min 13686 avg 13692 median 13692 12% max 13698 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3501 avg 3731 median 3720 47% max 3972 Points min 1840 avg 2330 median 2477 31% max 2720 Points min 1982 avg 2244 median 2244 28% max 2506 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3463 avg 3749 median 3782 54% max 4003 Points min 1862 avg 2362 median 35% max 2634 Points min 1946 avg 2226 median 2226 32% max 2506 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 592 avg 598 median 598 26% max 604 Points min 392 avg 393 median 393 17% max 394 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 1890 avg 1920 median 7% max 1949 Points min 1448 avg 1478 median 1478 5% max 1508 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1799 avg 1819 median 1821 19% max 1833 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5754 avg 5843 median 7% max 5917 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1835 avg 1858 median 1858 26% max 1881 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5683 avg 5800 median 14% max 5916 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 787 avg 1443 median 1443 12% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2565 avg 2600 median 24% max 2634 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11443 avg 11547 median 23% max 11650 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5224 avg 5235 median 11% max 5245 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 6446 avg 6539 median 6539 17% max 6632 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2472 avg 2950 median 2646 3% max 3731 ms min 3035 avg 3370 median 4% max 3800 ms min 2912 avg 3648 median 4% max 4383 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 15947 avg 16825 median 16604 16% max 17925 Points min 9771 avg 11817 median 12% max 12802 Points min 10328 avg 11945 median 11945 11% max 13562 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 71 avg median 83 19% max 97 Points min 57 avg median 16% max 72 Points min 47 avg median 14% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 135848 avg 136892 median 137134 47% max 137693 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 3343 avg 6694 median 7636 23% max 8159 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 43917 avg 44744 median 44198 54% max 46663 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 37446 avg 45655 median 47945 15% max 49284 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 63606 avg 65473 median 40% max 66830 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 155113 avg 162553 median 162918 29% max 169262 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 55189 avg 62040 median 58957 49% max 71973 Points min 7553 avg 26433 median 26433 22% max 45313 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 45079 avg 53673 median 47554 38% max 68387 Points min 36796 avg 41477 median 41477 33% max 46158 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 56693 avg 68299 median 64645 12% max 83558 Points min 49409 avg 52655 median 52655 10% max 55901 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 92494 avg 97432 median 94457 34% max 105346 Points min 67712 avg 68330 median 68330 25% max 68948 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 259370 avg 291444 median 295579 28% max 319383 Points min 172068 avg 188895 median 188895 18% max 205722 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 178496 avg 180262 median 180127 24% max 182163 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3402 avg 3476 median 3491 18% max 3518 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 4719 avg 4933 median 10% max 5372 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 7541 avg 8133 median 7695 50% max 9164 Points min 6453 avg 6824 median 44% max 7460 Points min 6832 avg 7554 median 7554 49% max 8276 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 9189 avg 10361 median 9824 49% max 12070 Points min 7041 avg 8137 median 8201 41% max 9345 Points min 8346 avg 9745 median 49% max 11143 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 368 avg 554 median 11% max 739 min Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 β 100% n=17Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 β 75% n=17Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 β 78% n=17 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 15. 1307520 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10981 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11301 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 12116 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10981 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 10981 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11301 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11301 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 26 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 27 return log +0s ... SRMVWy.